In the competitive world of commercial lending, the efficiency and effectiveness of loan officers are key to the success of financial institutions. This article compares two types of commercial loan officers: the “Traditional Loan Officer” (TLO) and the “Deal-Maker” (DM). The TLO works manually, relying on email and phone calls, and focuses heavily on personal connections with customers. The DM, on the other hand, uses advanced loan origination (LO) technology to communicate with team members and manage various administrative tasks.
Let’s see how technology impacts productivity, customer satisfaction, and overall performance in commercial lending.
The TLO operates in a largely manual environment, handling all aspects of the loan origination process independently. This role involves identifying and qualifying viable loan leads, gathering necessary documentation, coordinating with analysts, and ensuring the bank has all the information needed to make a lending decision. The TLO spends a significant portion of their time on administrative and clerical tasks, which can be labor-intensive and time-consuming.
One of the critical challenges faced by the TLO is time management. Conversations with commercial lenders reveal that up to 50% of a TLO’s time is dedicated to administrative tasks like file collection, needs list preparation, follow-up, data entry, information clarification, calendar management, document review, CRM updating, and pipeline report generation. These tasks, while essential, don’t directly contribute to revenue generation or customer engagement—thereby limiting the TLO’s productivity. If a TLO has 30–40 hours each week available for productive activities, imagine the business growth if that administrative time could be reduced.
Pipeline management for the TLO is a manual process. The TLO manually prepares reports for management, tracking the progress of each loan application. This can lead to inefficiencies, errors, and delays, affecting the loan approval process and misleading management on loan closing timelines. The lack of an LO platform limits the TLO’s visibility into their pipeline, making it challenging to prioritize tasks effectively.
The significant time spent on administrative tasks leaves the TLO with less time for direct customer interaction. This can impact customer service quality, as the TLO may struggle to respond promptly to inquiries, provide updates, or address concerns. Information requests and answers sometimes get lost between the applicant and the TLO, or between the TLO and the applicant’s team, like appraisers, real estate brokers, and lawyers. The manual environment requires the TLO to constantly scan multiple apps and channels to find the latest communication. Common complaints from business loan applicants include long processing times, multiple requests for the same information, and a lack of transparency. These issues often stem from poor communication and inconvenient document handling.
Moreover, the TLO has less time to get to know the applicant, which means they risk missing critical information. This lack of understanding can limit the lender’s creativity in finding the best solutions for the applicant, forcing the TLO to stick strictly within bank lending parameters.
In contrast, the DM operates within an environment supported by an LO platform. This technology aims to maximize the DM’s time with applicants and enhance their ability to identify and qualify leads. The platform manages necessary documents, tracks loan application progress, advises team members on tasks, notifies the DM of unfulfilled tasks, and facilitates communication across all channels. This integration streamlines the loan process, reducing the administrative burden on the DM.
The DM spends only about 15% of their time on clerical and administrative activities—a significant reduction compared to the TLO. Automation of tasks like needs list production, task prioritization, enhanced communication, document management, loan package creation, and report generation frees up the DM’s time. This allows the DM to focus on building client relationships, identifying new business opportunities, and negotiating loan terms.
The LO platform used by the DM offers robust pipeline management capabilities. Management can access the DM’s pipeline in real-time, providing visibility into deal progress. Automated reports eliminate the need for manual report preparation. This real-time tracking and reporting enable better decision-making, faster approvals, and more efficient loan processing. It also allows a new DM to step in during vacations or if a lender leaves.
With reduced administrative workload, the DM can dedicate more time to customer interaction. The DM can respond quickly to inquiries, provide timely updates, and offer personalized service. The LO platform supports communication across multiple channels, enhancing the customer experience by ensuring clients can reach the DM through their preferred method of contact. The applicant becomes a “partner” in the process with full access to their application’s status.
A critical moment in a customer’s relationship with the bank is when they apply for a loan. Improving the experience at this crucial time shows that the bank has the applicant’s best interest at heart. This personalized approach can create deep customer loyalty, as applicants feel valued and understood.
The DM’s use of technology significantly enhances productivity. By automating routine tasks, the DM can handle more loan applications than the TLO. The reduced time spent on administrative activities allows the DM to focus on revenue-generating activities, leading to higher overall performance. The DM can also review their pipeline in real time on any device.
Automation improves accuracy and efficiency. The manual processes followed by the TLO are prone to errors and delays, whereas the DM’s automated system ensures tasks are completed correctly and on time. This reduces the risk of oversights that could delay loan approvals or cause compliance issues.
Customer satisfaction is notably higher with the DM due to increased visibility and responsiveness. The DM’s ability to provide timely updates and communicate effectively across multiple channels enhances the overall customer experience. In contrast, the TLO’s limited time for customer interaction can lead to slower response times—and lower satisfaction levels.
The real-time reporting capabilities of the LO platform provide management with valuable insights into the loan pipeline. This allows for better resource allocation, quicker decision-making, and improved strategic planning. The TLO’s manual reporting process offers limited visibility and can hinder management’s ability to make informed decisions.
The commercial loan officer’s position is one of the most expensive on a lender’s payroll. The reduction in administrative and clerical time spent by the DM can add up to the equivalent of several additional loan officer positions. This improved efficiency enhances productivity and provides significant cost savings for the bank, allowing resources to be reallocated to other critical areas.
While the DM’s use of technology offers numerous advantages, potential challenges include the investment of time and resources to implement a sophisticated LO platform and the learning curve for loan officers adapting to new technology. Management must prioritize the adoption of the LO platform to ensure its success.
For the TLO, the primary challenge is the inefficiency inherent in a manual process. Continuing with traditional methods may deliver a superior experience up to a point, but the TLO’s bandwidth will limit their ability to serve customers and generate new business.
When choosing an LO platform, it’s crucial to evaluate the software’s ability to drive efficiency and provide a superior customer experience, supporting the loan officer’s contribution to the lender’s goals.
The comparison between the TLO and the DM highlights the transformative impact of technology on commercial lending. The DM’s automated environment significantly enhances productivity, accuracy, and customer satisfaction while providing management with valuable insights. Conversely, the TLO’s manual process, though less efficient, can offer personalized service at a lower capacity.
As financial institutions evolve, integrating technology in loan origination is becoming an increasingly important competitive factor. Balancing the efficiency of automation with the need for personal interaction will be key to achieving optimal performance and customer satisfaction in commercial lending.
Let mysherpas show you how to elevate your loan officer’s performance and customer satisfaction.
